Friday, June 13, 2014

Letter Number 18--From the Mary/Sue Collection--Robert to Sarah--PROBABLY 28 October 1863 (Based on the Date Written and the Context)

 
Letter 18 Original Front

 
Letter 18 Original Reverse

 
Letter 18 Enhanced Front

 
Letter 18 Enhanced Reverse
 
THE CORRESPONDANCE BETWEEN ROBERT BOND JR. (1819- 1894) AND WIFE SARAH ANN (MAIDEN NAME “FISK”—1823-1909) BETWEEN 1862 AND 1868
 
From the Mary/Sue Collection
Transcription of Letter “18”—from Robert to Sarah
28 October 1863—Date Inferred From Context
Transcribed by William B. Bond—Sept., 2013
FRONT:
Nacth Natchez Miss 28th/63
ever Dear Wife I will
trouble you with a few lines
I am get will1 feast2 I hope the
lines well3 you all the same
I think I sall4 come home
the forepart of Decmber5 I
I hope that you will have a
fat pig, your Robert Bond
I wood6 Like to have you see
Mr Leach7 and ask im8
Wat9 he wood6 get me Six
cords10 of Stones11 Dig and all
them into the barn, at
jest12 be lod13 the center west
of the Encop14 have im8 get them
as soon as you get this if it
is not frozen
if he can not get to15 men
to Dig them if you can
let me now as soon you
REVERSE:
get this I sall4 not be Abel16
to get one more
Before I Start for
home
Robert Bond
This is for S A Bond
FOOTNOTES:
1.  well
2.  fast
3.  will
4.  shall
5.  December
6.  would
7.  Mr. Leach is also referenced in letter #4 written by Sarah to Robert dated March 8th, 1863.
8.  him
9. what
10.  cords
11.  stones
12.  just
13.  below
14.  hencoop
15.  two
16.  able
ADDITIONAL NOTES:
NOTE 1: Reading this letter is a challenge due to the unusual spelling and grammar—in fact this letter has been a greater challenge than any of the other 8 I have transcribed thus far. In some cases I had to take a “best guess” as to what was written. But it should be remembered that this letter was written “in the field” most likely under very difficult circumstances. So it is a treasure that it exists at all.
If anyone who examines a scan of the original can better make out what the words are or can see anywhere that there is an error in the transcription, I would welcome their input.
The following is my attempt at a transcription of the entire letter with spelling and grammar corrected:
FRONT SIDE:
Natchez Miss 28th/63
Ever wear wife--I will
trouble you with a few lines.
I am getting well fast. I hope the(se)
lines will (find) you all the same.
I think I shall come home
the forepart of December. I
I hope that you will have a
fat pig.  Your Robert Bond
I would like to have you see
Mr. Leach and ask him
what he would get me six
cords of stones. Dig <and> all (of)
them into the barn, at
just below the center west
of the hencoop. Have him get them
as soon as you get this if it
is not frozen.
If he can not, get two men
to dig them if you can.
Let me now as soon (as) you
REVERSE SIDE:
get this. I shall not be able
to get one more
before I start for
home.
Robert Bond
This is for S A Bond
NOTE 2:  This letter was written on the front and back of a single sheet of paper. There is no “embossed seal” indicating the paper manufacturer at the upper left of the front side as was common on many papers of the time. The letter seems to be complete.
NOTE 3: One of the mysteries of this letter is what month in 1863 it was written. Considering the “Wisconsin at Vicksburg: Report of the Wisconsin-Vicksburg Monument” page 143:
—the 12th Wisconsin (in which Robert was enlisted) left for Natchez, MS from Vicksburg, MS on August 17th, 1863 and remained in Natchez until November 22nd, 1863. They then left Natchez on November 22nd traveling back to Vicksburg--but returned to Natchez on December 5, remaining there until January 23rd, 1864.
The location and date on this letter is “Natchez 28/63”, so it couldn’t have been written November 28th since the Wisconsin 12th was not in Natchez at that time. This is supported by letter #27 dated December 20th, 1963 in which Sarah makes reference to the fact that her letter was being sent to Vicksburg.
The letter also could not have been written December 28th since in this letter; Robert makes reference that he would “come home the forepart of Decmber.So this leaves August, September, and October as possibilities.
I believe it was written October 28th, 1863, because there is a reference in the letter to “get them as soon as you get this if it is not frozen.” It would be unlikely for the ground in Wisconsin to be frozen in August or September, but it could be frozen in late October.
NOTE 4:  As mentioned, this letter was extremely difficult to transcribe and I may have made an error somewhere. Robert begins the letter with a loving greeting and an inquiry as to the family’s health. He follows this with the statement that he is getting well fast, but it is not known from what ailment he was suffering.
Robert finishes the first paragraph by stating that he plans to return home the first part of December and his hopes for a “fat pig” when he arrives. It should be noted that according to the reference above (NOTE 3: Wisconsin at Vicksburg: Report of the Wisconsin-Vicksburg Monument” page 143) only soldiers with veteran status started for Wisconsin on the 13th of March, 1864 for a 30 day furlough. The regiment then reformed on the 3rd of May in Cairo, Illinois, moving out and back to the war on the 10th of May. Robert had not been enlisted long enough to achieve Veteran status, and presumable did not go home on furlough. In fact thus far there is no evidence that Robert returned home at any time during his enlistment.
The second paragraph on the front side was the greatest challenge to transcribe. It seems Robert was asking Sarah to ask “Mr Leach” (who is referred to in letter #9--written by Sarah to Robert on March 8th, 1863) to dig six cords of stones into the barn if the ground was not frozen. And if Mr. Leach could not do this, to try to get two other men to do it. It is not known why the barn needed six cords of stones.
The closing on the reverse side is also a bit of a mystery. Robert states that he will “not be Abel to get one more Before I Start for home.” One more what? Presumably one more letter and this might make sense if he wrote this letter on October 28th and he planned to be home at the beginning of December. But it seems that other correspondence between Sarah and Robert took less than a month, so I’m not sure why Robert thought he would not get another letter before he started for home.
The letter finishes with a closing and at the bottom of the reverse is the line: “This is for S A Bond”. Why was this necessary if the letter was in an envelope addressed to Sarah? Did Robert give the letter to someone else to give to Sarah?
Altogether, this letter is one of the most difficult to interpret.

No comments:

Post a Comment