Thursday, June 12, 2014

Letter Number 47--From the Mary/Sue Collection--Robert to Sarah AND Sarah to Robert--12 February 1867 and 26 February 1867 (Dates Provided in Letters)


                                                           Letter 47 Original Front

 
Letter 47 Original Reverse

 
Letter 47 Enhanced Front

 
 
Letter 47 Enhanced Reverse
 

THE CORRESPONDANCE BETWEEN ROBERT BOND JR. (1819- 1894) AND WIFE SARAH ANN (MAIDEN NAME “FISK”—1823-1909) BETWEEN 1862 AND 1868

From the Mary/Sue collection
 

Transcription of Letter “47”—from Robert to Sarah AND from Sarah to Robert

12 February 1867 and 26 February 1867—Dates Provided in Letter

Transcribed by William B. Bond—November, 2013


FRONT OF THE LETTER FROM ROBERT TO SARAH:

                   Wood Co in the Pines
 
Feb th 12 18671


Dear wife I have gest2 gote3 a letter

I was glad to hear that you was

as well as you are I have not time

to write you a long letter I sent in

my last letter for you too4 get a

order of E KingsburyA for

twenty Dollars I dont know

weather5 you got it or not


          I am well and hope the

          lines will find you the same

          my truest6 is in the

          Lord


          R B

(Written on the side in the margin)

R Bond


NOTES ON THE LETTER FROM ROBERT TO SARAH:

1.  February 12th, 1867

2.  just

3.  got

4. to

5.  whether

6.  trust


LIST OF FAMILY MEMBERS MENTIONED IN THE LETTER FROM ROBERT TO SARAH:

There are no family members mentioned in this letter.


LIST OF OTHER INDIVIDUALS MENTIONED IN THE LETTER FROM ROBERT TO SARAH:

A. “E Kingsbury” may be the same Kingsbury as “Kingsbury place” referred to in a letter written by Robert to Sarah dated January 30th, 1863.  He is certainly the same Kingsbury as “Mr Kingsbury” which Sarah referred to in the second half of this letter written to Robert and dated February 26th, 1867. “Kingsbury place” may have been rented land since Sarah writes in the January 30th 1863 letter: “I have paid Mr Cowan five dollars twards that plowing on the Kingsbury place…” In addition, it is possible that the “E Kingsbury” referred to in this letter as well as in letters dated January 30th 1863 and February 26th, 1867 is the same as “King Note” referred to in a letter from Sarah to Robert dated December 18th, 1863, “King” referred to in a letter from Sarah to Robert dated December 20th 1863 and “E. B. King” referred to in a letter written by Sarah to Robert dated May 24th, 1863.

ADDITIONAL NOTES ON THE LETTER FROM ROBERT TO SARAH:

NOTE 1:  Letter #47 is two letters written on the same sheet of paper—the first dated February 12th, 1867 from Robert to Sarah, and the other—written upside down and starting on the reverse side of the sheet—dated February 26th 1867 from Sarah to Robert. Robert’s letter is on one side of the sheet only, while Sarah’s is on both sides of the sheet. Both letters were probably written on the same sheet because—as Sarah writes in her February 26th letter—“paper is scarce.” I have treated these two letters as separate in this transcription, but refer to them together as “Letter #47.”


NOTE 2: It should be noted that Robert’s handwriting and spelling in this letter are much improved over that found in letters 2 and 3—but still irregular. 


If anyone who examines a scan of the original letter can better make out what the words are or can see anywhere that there is an error in the transcription, I would welcome their input.


The following is my attempt at a transcription of the letter with spelling and grammar corrected:


FRONT OF THE LETTER FROM ROBERT TO SARAH:

Wood Co in the Pines

Feb 12th 1867


Dear wife I have just got a letter

I was glad to hear that you was

as well as you are I have not time

to write you a long letter I sent in

my last letter for you to get an

order of E Kingsbury for

twenty dollars I don’t know

whether you got it or not.


          I am well and hope the

          lines will find you the same

          my trust is in the

          Lord


          R B

 (Written on the side in the margin)

R Bond


NOTE 3: There is no “embossed seal” at the upper left of the front side as was common for the time.


NOTE 4:  This letter was found loose and not in an envelope.

 
NOTE 5:  In this letter, Robert indicates that he is glad that he received a letter from Sarah, informs her that he is well and his hopes that Sarah is also well. In addition, Robert asks Sarah to “get a order of E Kingsbury for twenty Dollars.” It becomes clear in the second half of this letter from Sarah to Robert dated February 26th 1867 that the term “order” is a loan of money.


FRONT OF THE LETTER FROM SARAH TO ROBERT:

          Lyndon Feb 26th/671

          Dear husband, on returning from meeting

on Sunday I found a letter from you which

Mr HallG had left we were all verry glad

to hear from you and that you were well, As

to that order2 I have not got it, But Mr KingsburyH

offered me one, as I had then got the boots3 to the

Station4, I thought I would not get an order, if I

could get along without it we have had rather

poor luck with the stock this winter our little

yearling lamb has died and the old sow has had

her pigs an and eat them up so that

we don’t gain in stock but raather5 decrease

I think the sheep are rather poor6 we have two

lambs left one our own, and one Sister AikensI

her ews7 had three and lost two we milk

the old cow yet she give about a teacupful

a day I think she is coming in8 our hens

are laying well now, we are having 12 eggs per day

I sold seven dozen I could not get the wheat

hauled when you wrote but expect to, today or morrow9

for VaughnsJ Stock have got to it AugustusA was

up 22nd and took SarahB to the Masonic Ball at

Kilbourn10 I have not seen AlvaroC or LouisaD

since I wrote last but little AllyE has had the

lung fever since he was


REVERSE OF THE LETTER FROM SARAH TO ROBERT:

smart11 the last I heard we are about as well as usual

WillieF has had a hard cold and considerable fever with

it but is better now Father BeaumanK was not able

to be at the prayer meeting on sunday Sister CopeL

and I called to see him he has a severe cold

I must draw to a close       for you see paper is scarce

so hoping you will soon return I will say good bye


                                                          from your

                                                          ever true wife

                                                          Sarah A Bond


NOTES ON THE LETTER FROM SARAH TO ROBERT:

1.  Lyndon, Wisconsin February 26th, 1867

2.  an “order” is a loan

3.  Presumably Sarah sent Robert a pair of boots.

4.  Lyndon station—a railway station.

5.  rather

6.  “poor” in this context means sick.

7.  ewes

8.  “coming in” probably refers to coming in season—ready for breeding.

9.  tomorrow

10.  Kilbourn is about 8 miles south east of Lyndon.

11.  “smart” can mean to endure sharp pain.

 
LIST OF FAMILY MEMBERS MENTIONED:

A.  Augustus Stephen Boughton (1846-1933) Husband of Sarah Elizabeth Bond (1847-1912)--daughter and second oldest of the 4 children of Robert and Sarah to survive to adulthood. Augustus and Sarah were married December 25th, 1867.

B.  Sarah Elizabeth Bond (1847-1912)— Daughter and second oldest of the 4 children of Robert and Sarah to survive to adulthood.

C.  Alvaro N Griffin (1838-1916) served—along with Robert—in the 12th Wisconsin Infantry Volunteers Company E during the Civil War. Husband of Louisa Maria Bond (1845-1896)—Daughter and oldest of the 4 children of Robert and Sarah to survive to adulthood.


D.  Louisa Maria Bond (1845-1896)—Daughter and oldest of the 4 children of Robert and Sarah to survive to adulthood. Married to Alvaro N. Griffin (1838-1916) who served—along with Robert—in the 12th Wisconsin Infantry Volunteers Company E during the Civil War.

E.  Frank Alvaro “Allie” Griffin (1865-1929) Oldest child and only son of Alvaro N Griffin and wife Louisa Maria Bond.

F. William Othello “Willie” Bond (1860-1928)—Son and youngest of the 4 children of Robert and Sarah to survive to adulthood.


LIST OF OTHER INDIVIDUALS MENTIONED IN THE LETTER FROM ROBERT TO SARAH:

G. “Mr Hall” There is an “Oscar Hall” mentioned in letter #9 dated March 8th, 1863 and a “Mr. Hall” mentioned in letter #46 dated February 1st, 1867. The Mr Hall mentioned in this letter and in the February 1st letter is clearly the same person—who seems to deliver mail back and forth from Lyndon, Wisconsin to “Wood Co. in the Pines” or “camp.” But it is not known whether or not this is the same person as “Oscar Hall” mentioned in the March 8th letter.

H. “Mr Kingsbury” may be the same Kingsbury as “Kingsbury place” referred to in a letter written by Robert to Sarah dated January 30th, 1863.  He is certainly the same Kingsbury as “E Kingsbury” which Robert referred to in the first half of this letter written to Sarah and dated February 12th, 1867. “Kingsbury place” may have been rented land since Sarah writes in the January 30th 1863 letter: “I have paid Mr Cowan five dollars twards that plowing on the Kingsbury place…” In addition, it is possible that the “Mr Kingsbury” referred to in this letter as well as in letters dated January 30th 1863 and February 12th, 1867 is the same as “King Note” referred to in a letter from Sarah to Robert dated December 18th, 1863, “King” referred to in a letter from Sarah to Robert dated December 20th 1863 and “E. B. King” referred to in a letter written by Sarah to Robert dated May 24th, 1863.

I.  “Sister Aiken” is presumably part of the session of the church that the family attends. It is not known which church this is.  

J.  “Vaughn” is probably Ira Vaughn—a close neighbor according to the 1860 U.S. Federal Census.

K.  “Father Beauman” is presumably part of the session of the church that the family attends. It is not known which church this is.

L.  “Sister Cope” is presumably part of the session of the church that the family attends. It is not known which church this is.   James A Cope—who is probably a relative of Sister Cope—served in the 12th Wisconsin Infantry Volunteers Company E with Robert during the Civil War. 


ADDITIONAL NOTES ON THE LETTER FROM SARAH TO ROBERT:

NOTE 1:  Letter #47 is two letters written on the same sheet of paper—the first dated February 12th, 1867 is from Robert to Sarah, and the other—written upside down and starting on the reverse side of the sheet—dated February 26th 1867 is from Sarah to Robert. Both letters were probably written on the same sheet because—as Sarah writes in her February 26th letter—“paper is scarce.” I have treated these two letters as separate in this transcription, but refer to them together as “Letter #47.”


NOTE 2:  The writing in this letter is quite clear and the words are distinct. So the transcription should be quite accurate. But if anyone who examines a scan of the original can better make out what the words are or can see anywhere that there is an error in the transcription, I would welcome their input.


NOTE 3: The spelling and grammar in this letter are reasonable so I do not believe an overall transcription is necessary.


NOTE 4: There is no “embossed seal” at the upper left of the front side as was common for the time.


NOTE 5:  This letter was found loose and not in an envelope.


NOTE 6: Sarah’s letter to Robert starts with Sarah saying that she had returned from a meeting on Sunday—presumably a church meeting—and being glad that she had received a letter from Robert. She goes on to say that she did not get an “order” (loan) from Mr. Kingsbury and that she hopes to “get along without it.”  Sarah describes the troubles she has had with the livestock on the farm and that “Vaughn’s Stock” have gotten into the wheat. She mentions that her daughter Sarah attended a Masonic Ball in Kilbourn with Augustus (daughter Sarah’s future husband) and that she had not heard from her oldest daughter Louisa and Louisa’s husband Alvaro.  Louisa and Alvaro’s son “Ally” is sick with “lung fever” and Sarah and Robert’s son “Willie” has a “hard cold.” Farher Beauman is sick with a severe cold, and Sarah and Sister Cope went to visit him. Sarah closes by saying that “paper is scarce”--hence the need to write two letters on one sheet.

No comments:

Post a Comment